An eye is an eye, right?

All eyes are pretty much the same; they are used for seeing, right? Well not exactly. It turns out that there is a nearly endless variation of eyes in the animal kingdom both in form and function, ranging from nearly microscopic to the size of a dinner plate, and varying just as widely in what they “see”.

From The Week:
eye 2

Box Jellyfish on Youtube:


Box Jellyfish Scientific Article:

F1.large
The field of gambling is once again in the public spotlight – along with smoking, alcoholism and helmetless skiing. In 1996 the U.S. Congress created the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, which was supposed to “conduct a comprehensive study of the impact of gambling on the social and economic conditions of the United States.”[1] However, instead of a “comprehensive study,” the commission was limited pin up casino to reviewing a rather narrow scope of activities. In particular, its agenda declared its desire to get to the bottom of “the problem of pathological gambling addiction.”[2] The goal is an excellent one in itself, but in light of the constant pressure for government intervention in this area, any study of the impact of gambling must also consider the impact of government regulation on the gambling industry[3].
 

More Content . . .

    An eye is an eye, right?
    Share
    Tagged on:                     

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Share
    Share