Colonial Legacies

Why say “Introduced Nuisance Species?”

The fear of immigration is never isolated to humans… It includes nonhuman migrants in the form of unwanted germs, insects, plants, and animals.”

Banu Subramaniam in The Ethics and Rhetoric of Invasion Ecology

Language and the way we describe things is always impactful, and in science and ecology especially, using specific vocabulary is very important in describing the natural world. It is not only important to make our language as specific and clear as possible, but also to make sure our language is inclusive and doesn’t promote harmful stereotypes or histories.

Most relevant to this project, terms like “invasive,” “alien,” or “exotic” species have very xenophobic, anti-immigrant, and militaristic origins and connotations. Thus, we try to replace such terms with terms like “introduced nuisance species,” “adventive species,” or “non-endemic species.”

Here are more terms to keep in mind:

Use This!Not this:
Introduced nuisance speciesInvasive/Alien/Exotic/non-native species – xenophobic nativist origin
Participant science or community scienceCitizen Science – exclusive to non-citizens
Sex/Male/FemaleMan/Woman – Gender is a social construct, don’t use it when describing biological sex
Established/Early Successional SpeciesColonization/Colonizer – normalizes terms of human violence, racism, and genocide as a natural phenomenon
Identified/DescribedDiscover/Discovery – erases longstanding indigenous knowledge of environments and ecosystems prior to colonialism and Western science
Sourced from the EEB Language Project Term Repository

Learn more:

Colonialism and “Invasion” Biology

It is not hard to see that European colonialism and the spread of introduced species are linked beyond their shared language and terminology. A Nature Ecology & Evolution study found that regions that were once occupied by the same European colonial power — such as India and Sri Lanka — tend to have similar species of introduced plants. The concept of “environmental imperialism” describes the alteration of a native landscape to suit a colonial project, and nowadays, due to globalization, biotic homogenization—the replacement of native communities with expanding introduced cosmopolitan species—has become even more impactful. In studying the topic of introduced nuisance species, especially on Pacific islands, we must recognise the settler colonial structures that have allowed for the introduction of those species. Introduced species that outcompete indigenous species relied upon by indigenous communities as resources and cultural practices are just one of the many destructive impacts that colonialism deals onto those communities.

Learn more:

Science and Indigenous Knowledge

At school, I was taught this myth that it was European and American white men who discovered all these different physical systems on Earth — on land, in the skies and in the water. But Indigenous people have been observing those same systems for hundreds or thousands of years.

Dominique David-Chavez in Weaving Indigenous knowledge into the scientific method

Western science often paints itself as the paramount source for objective truth, while traditional forms of knowledge are viewed as biased. In reality, all forms of knowledge are inherently biased, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) gathered by indigenous people over thousands of years and hundreds of generations of direct contact with the environment has immense value in both researching and learning more about the natural world, as well as in taking action to manage and conserve ecosystems that have become under threat due to the legacies of colonialism and industrialization. There have been many examples of indigenous knowledge guiding scientific work and research, but it is also important to approach these relationships with care and respect. Western science has often wrongfully claimed credit for “discoveries” that have been well known to indigenous people beforehand, and indigenous knowledge has often been invalidated in the eyes of science. Therefore, it’s important to question assumptions on what can be considered “science,” and work to involve and carefully foster respectful relationships with indigenous communities themselves, and make sure they are appropriately compensated for their contributions.

We have the right to free, prior and informed consent before research relating to our
biological resources commences. Researchers, corporations, educational institutions,
government or others conducting such research must fully and entirely inform Kanaka Maoli
regarding the purposes of their research and recognize our right to refuse to participate.”

The Paoakalani Declaration

Learn more: