Notice – Policies and resources for the campus community on the COVID-19 global pandemic, including necessary health and safety precautions and how to obtain more information from health care providers, state health authorities, and the CDC's COVID-19 web site

Frog head coming out of the water.

Reanalysis of global amphibian crisis study finds important flaws

Though biodiversity is in crisis globally, amphibians in particular face a variety of threats. One such threat comes from pathogens like the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd). Bd causes chytridiomycosis, a disease that research indicates contributes to the decline of some amphibians. New research, however, now calls into question some prior evidence that links the widespread pathogen to hundreds of amphibian declines.

A frog's head coming out of the water.

Last year in the journal Science, a research review by Scheele et al. concluded that Bd caused the decline of at least 501 amphibian species, of which 90 have gone extinct. That paper suggested that species losses due to Bd are “orders of magnitude greater than for other high-profile wildlife pathogens.” But a recent reanalysis led by Berkeley researchers found that Scheele et al.’s main conclusions lack evidence and are unreproducible.

In a Comment published today in Science, the group conducting the reanalysis—including lead authors Max Lambert and Molly Womack, who are postdocs in the lab of professor Erica Rosenblum in the Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management (ESPM)—identified a number of data deficiencies and methodological issues in the Scheele et al. study. Working through the methods and datasets, they faced challenges in reproducing conclusions while identifying numerous instances of missing data. In some cases, data gaps failed to link Bd to species declines—even for many species which were previously reported with high certainty that Bd was the cause.

 

A yellow and black striped frog on leaves.

Lambert and Womack note that their reanalysis does not minimize the role Bd has played in amphibian declines and that “chytridiomycosis has irrefutably harmed amphibians.”

A number of co-authors involved in the reanalysis had previously studied the harmful effects of the chytrid fungus on amphibians in California and Central America. For some species, the data make clear that amphibian chytrid fungus, which has received tremendous attention, has contributed to declines. However, Lambert, Womack, and their collaborators found that the evidence in Scheele et al.’s analysis is negligible—or even absent—for many important species.

They state that it remains unclear exactly how many and which amphibian species have been harmed by Bd.  Relative to other threats that amphibians face, the role chytrid plays in global declines is also uncertain. In many cases, according to the Science comment, the cause of amphibian declines remains a mystery.

The reanalysis authors argue that transparent data collection and analysis are crucial—both for science and conservation efforts. “It is more critical than ever for scientists to provide responsible narratives based on transparent and reproducible data and methods,” says Lambert. “Doing so will produce better science and more effective conservation.”

Additional UC Berkeley authors on this study, from ESPM and the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, include Erica B. Rosenblum, Allison Q. Byrne, Obed Hernández-Gómez, Clay F. Noss, and Andrew P. Rothstein. The study also included researchers from the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, San Francisco State University, Arizona State University, Utah State University, Northern Arizona University, and Vanderbilt University.